2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 6: Distribution

Part V back in January was supposed to be the final installment of my post-CES chronicles, but we’ll add a Part VI to look at how all these products are getting to market. Each of these posts includes a quick look back on 2005 trends and a quick discussion of products introduced at CES 2006. This one is less about CES and more an essay about the rising power of distributors in home theater…

In 2005:

Go back ten or twenty years, and there were two main distribution channels to bring home audio and television products to market: big box retailers, and specialty audio retailers (some of whom were branching into home theater with the advent of large screen televisions, laserdisc players, and surround sound). Today there are two more ways to reach consumers: the Internet, and custom installers, also called the CEDIA channel.

To service custom installers, major distributors are gaining power. Common in the computing industry, a distributor is simply a middleman – a large wholesaler with a warehouse who takes on inventory and then resells it to retailers (or, in this case, to custom installers). Nobody likes a middleman because they add costs, but when you have a lot of small retailers placing small orders, manufacturers often cannot deal with them; enter the distributor. In the world of computing – particularly small business-oriented products, VARs (Value Added Resellers) provide a lot of the IT services used by law firms, florists, etc. When they need a network firewall or piece of software, it is far more efficient for everybody for the VAR to call a major distributor like Ingram Micro, which specializes in putting together small orders, rather than try to open an account with Microsoft or Cisco.

At CES…

CES isn’t the primary show for custom installation, that would be the big CEDIA trade show in Indianapolis in September. But it was interesting to see how the CES Show Daily (a thick daily trade show paper produced just for CES) was chock full of distributor ads touting A/V equipment. Distributors are riding the custom installation wave, a market that is becoming seriously crowded.

  • For starters, a lot of the independant A/V stores are having a really tough time and are essentially becoming custom installers themselves. Consumers have been putting more money towards big screen TVs, which are low margin in the best of times. To compete with the big box stores, smaller retailers often sell TVs at a loss, and hope to make up the margins on speakers, which are far more profitable. But audio sales are down – the Wall St. Journal reported earlier this month that audio sales dropped 12% last year as consumers bought more plasmas and iPods and fewer speakers and receivers. This is not true across the board; I interviewed an employee at a local high end A/V mini-chain who told me he’s having a banner year. His secret: he refuses to sell plasmas without an accompanying set of slim speakers from Definitive Technologies or KEF. But when audio can’t pay the bills for cut-rate video pricing, then the other option for independant retailers is to make money on services, specifically custom home installation.

  • Electricians are moving from one low voltage specialty – custom lighting installation – to other (ostensibly similar) low voltage jobs: computer networking, whole house automation, and home theater. True, some knowledge of acoustics would certainly be useful (read: ought to be required) before an electrician is qualified to set up a home theater. But there is a definite convergence between home automation, networking, and A/V underway already, and nearly every custom A/V job requires an electrician at some point, so this trend is likely to accelerate.

  • Finally, traditional custom home theater installation benefits from the decor-friendly plasma push. Many consumers are not capable of installing a plasma on their own: it’s made of glass and must be uncrated properly, it’s heavy and brackets must be mounted on studs, and it requires A/V sources to be in the right spot if a wall mount is going to look professional. Most consumers are not capable of installing in-wall speakers, which require cutting into drywall and pulling wire through walls.

The main reason why distribution makes sense for CEDIA members (and their retail and trades-based company) is structural. Custom installers typically need small orders from several different manufacturers drop shipped directly to the work site on an irregular basis. This is something a distributor is designed to handle, and nearly impossible to replicate by setting up one-on-one relationships with manufacturers. Distributors are now advertising that not only do they own inventory, but they hold it at mulitple warehouses around the country to provide just in time delivery on products so that installation schedules don’t slip. Distributors higher up in the food chain ("Value Added Distributors," or VADs) also take over some of the mix-and-match/training functions that can help an installer hone in on just the right doodad for the job.

-avi

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 6: Distribution Read More

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 5: Convergence

Part V, the final installment of my post-CES chronicles; each of these posts includes a quick look back on 2005 trends and a quick discussion of products introduced at CES 2006. This installment: Convergence

In 2005…

Windows XP Media Center Edition PC sales finally took off – but as replacements for home PCs (wherever in the home they may reside, not necessarily the living room), and using traditional vertical box form factors, not the electronics-rack-style Home Theater PC. With Microsoft dropping the requirement for TV tuners, many of the XPMCE PCs were just that – regular PCs with a nifty 10 foot user interface for media control. Meanwhile, PVR functionality was integrated into the cable and satellite box in a big way, and moved time shifting into many more homes. The tech media declared place shifting the next big thing. Place shifting, the notion of watching your content anywhere you are using a web browser, was first introduced by Orb Networks (limited to PC-based content), followed by Sony’s LocationFree TV (control primarily of live TV) and then by Sling Media’s SlingBox (which allows viewing and control of nearly all content, including shows saved to a TiVo or ReplayTV).

At CES…

Sling Media introduced a Windows Mobile client for the SlingBox, solving one of the big problems of place shifting: very few people spend so much time on the road that they would be willing to buy a gadget to gain access to their home content. But moving the content to any Windows Mobile smartphone is more generally useful; everyone has some down time in their schedule that could be filled with even more TV! SlingBox for Windows Mobile also bypasses a lot of the services that wireless carriers are hoping to sell to consumers directly, and in this sense, it is an extremely disruptive technology.

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 5: Convergence Read More

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 4: Media Formats

Part IV of my post-CES scribbles; each of the next few posts includes a quick look back on 2005 trends and a quick discussion of products introduced at CES 2006. This installment: Media Formats

In 2005…

The warring HD disc camps (HD-DVD and Blu-Ray Disc) could not achieve compromise, but did not actually ship anything to the market, either. With nearly no support from content owners, SACD and DVD-Audio essentially died in 2005.

At CES 2006…

Toshiba hyped its first HD-DVD player at the modest price of only $499. In contrast, Pioneer announced a single Pioneer Elite Blu-Ray Disc player for $1800. Sony is still expecting to sell PS3’s with BD playback capability (and a reasonable price point), but no live PS3 units were shown at the show. In general, 2006 does not look like the year of prerecorded HD disc adoption. Pricing is too high, the available content library is too small, and there’s the whole format war issue. Worse, the DVD revolution is winding down, and even on an HDTV, many consumers will find that DVD is “good enough” regardless of the outcome of the format war.

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 4: Media Formats Read More

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 3: Audio

Part III of my post-CES rantings; each of the next few posts includes a quick look back on 2005 trends and a quick discussion of products introduced at CES 2006. This installment: Audio

In 2005…

Apple’s iPod ate up whatever audio interest there was left after the purchase of that HDTV. The audiophile approach (ignore it and it will go away) didn’t work, the competitive approach (building servers or portable products that compete with the iPod head on) dramatically didn’t work – though there were a handful of exceptions, and the conciliatory approach (if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em) of building iPod docks and add-ons got very, very crowded. One of the more notable exceptions to the “don’t compete with the iPod” rule was Sonos, which piggybacks on existing PC-based music libraries and distributes audio wirelessly around the house. The key to success here is both the flawless user interface and the premium consumer price point. Typical CE pricing would not support the margins Sonos needs to survive, but the Sonos system is still within reach of many consumers, as opposed to custom installed distributed audio systems which can often cost an order of magnitude more.

At CES 2006…

We saw more of everything. Competing with the iPod were several nano clones, Toshiba’s new (and impressive) GigaBeat Portable Media Center, and several Windows Media Center or set top box whole-house server products for storing your music collection (some piggybacking on Intel’s new VIIV campaign). The server efforts were at least partly conciliatory, as most included Apple iPod docking capabilities.

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 3: Audio Read More

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 2: Speakers

Part II of my post-CES ravings; each of the next few posts includes a quick look back on 2005 trends and a quick discussion of products introduced at CES 2006. 

In 2005…

To try to appeal to the flat panel TV crowd, speaker manufacturers at all price points built flat speakers, small speakers, and speakers intended to be mounted on the wall (some with just one cabinet to simplify wiring, or wireless rear speakers). Big brands did well with these offerings, but they tended to pull sales from elsewhere, not grow the category.  The other approach was to develop a line of in-wall speakers, some with high end pedigrees and/or THX certification. Unfortunately, it takes time for CEDIA installers to pick up new brands (installers are a conservative bunch, as you don’t ever want to have to service something installed in a wall or built into a cabinet), so the jury is still out on this strategy.  To compensate for lower ASPs and margins, most speaker manufacture was moved to Asia.

At CES 2006…

We saw more of the same. What we have not seen yet are Chinese speaker manufacturers selling direct to U.S. consumers under their own brand names, taking the Aperion.com business model and eliminating the middleman (Aperion). That has started in the enthusiast space to a degree with companies like nOrh, but has not moved into the mainstream. Yet.

We also saw one company move decidedly in a different direction: Jamo introduced the 909’s, a $15,000 pair of speakers that do not have a rear cabinet.  The idea is simple: no enclosure, no possibility for audible colorations of the sound due to the cabinet. From a market perspective, this makes even more sense – audiophile consumers who are willing to have a free standing set of speakers in their room probably want to show them off.  Why not let them really show off the guts of the speakers by doing nothing to hide them? If Jamo is smart, it will release lower priced versions of the 909’s including a center channel and matching surrounds for home theater (the surrounds will probably need cabinets for wall mounting).

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 2: Speakers Read More

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 1: Flat Panels

I have just returned from CES 2006 in Las Vegas, where 150,000 geeks showed up to gawk at the bodacious sights to see in Las Vegas (103" plasmas) and ignored everything else (it seemed like half the shows in Vegas were dark). I’ll be breaking out the next few posts into a quick look back on 2005 trends and a quick discussion of products introduced at CES 2006. 

In 2005…

LCD, Plasma, and DLP TV sucked the life (or, more accurately, the money) out of every other aspect of home theater.  Prices on the big panels dropped enough that consumers who weren’t looking to upgrade did, and in most cases, all the money went to the display.

At CES 2006…

1080p was the spec to beat – everybody had at least one product with full progressive 1920×1080 resolution. New technologies included real world demos of SED and LED-based DLP systems without color wheels. The other big trend holding down pricing is the influx of no-name brands sourcing panels from the same fabs as the big brands and selling it direct for less. In cases where the display/upconversion electronics in the no name brands are good, this presents a major problem for the majors. And even when the quality is lousy, the glass is often the same (or just a generation or so behind), so the specs look good on paper, and the price looks great.

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 1: Flat Panels Read More

Sony’s Qualia Hunt Ends Without a Kill

The high end of the market is evolving: mainstream brands offering the same thing – only better – are having a tough time.  A couple of months ago Sony pulled the plug on its Qualia brand, despite excellent reviews of its SXRD projector and RPTV sets.  It seems Qualia was one luxury Sir Howard Stringer couldn’t afford in his reorg.  No reasons were given for the move, but I’d speculate that having a high R&D halo brand only helps when the main consumer electronics business it fuels makes money.  Since Sony is losing money across the line, it makes more sense to build the high end technology into mainstream products themselves, hopefully enabling a bit higher margins and injecting some profitability down the line.

That isn’t to say that the high end is dead – far from it.  The key is to provide a unique and differentiated experience.  Two examples:

  • When I met with Kaleidescape earlier this year, they emphasized not just the features and functions added to their $25,000 -$50,000 video archiving and distribution systems, but also the growing number of customers they have.  Kaleidescape is an example of a high end product that is not just a slightly better DVD player, but with the new bookmarking features, an entirely new way to watch movies. Movies start up in the right aspect ratio without any setup, resume exactly where they’re left off, and can be set to jump just to specific scenes – similar to listening just to specific music tracks across a genre instead of listening to an album at a time.
  • The D-Box lineup is another high end product creating a new market – something like an amusement park ride, physically moving your couch around in synchrony with the movie.  This is a step well beyond bass shakers that vibrate your couch when something goes "boom."  The D-Box X3ME (supposed to be pronounced "extreme") line recently added vertical motion to its entry level line.  Entry level is a matter of perspective: the MSRP is $10,000. An add-on field installable system is $4,299 plus either $3,000 for the controller or your own PC plus an $800 kit. The idea is to extend this beyond "the sky is the limit" crowd, but it is still a very high end product by anyone’s definition.

-avi

Sony’s Qualia Hunt Ends Without a Kill Read More

Sonos Expands Distribution Through the Front and Back Doors

Sonos announced today that Tweeter will be carrying the eponymous product at more than 150 retail locations throughout the U.S. (mostly in the Northeast).  Tweeter is now the largest retailer in the country to carry the Sonos Digital Music System, and Sonos claims a "quality over quantity" approach to signing up retail partners. Nonetheless, Sonos is on track to have 500 retail location partners by the end of 2005, the first holiday buying season that Sonos is available.

SonosTweeter should be a good fit for this mid-tier product: Sonos fits in between the half dozen $200 – $300 streaming music players on the market (none of which have found many buyers) and custom whole house audio systems, which start in the $2000 range with MusicCAST systems from Yamaha, but often end up costing $10,000 – $50,000 for any serious system retrofitted into existing construction by a custom installer.  Sonos starts with the premise that you’re already storing your digital music on a PC – why would you want to duplicate that? – but rather than simply stream the audio to a single location, Sonos provides a premium distributed listening experience akin to high end whole house audio products.

I had an interesting conversation this week with a Sonos executive.  Without downplaying the Tweeter distribution relationship, Sonos is also excited about their presence at Best Buy.  Oh, they couldn’t get in the front door at Best Buy – and the product requires considerable explanation on the sales floor, and Best Buy’s merchandising requirements aren’t geared for small startups like Sonos.  But Sonos is in Magnolia stores, which Best Buy bought back in 2000, and is now expanding into mini-stores within Best Buy’s big box format.  This provides Sonos with the best of both worlds – the traffic that a Best Buy generates with the higher sales touch of a specialty retailer.  It also helps Sonos maintain its premium brand without diluting it by appearing on the mass market shelf next to a $39 DVD player.

-avi

Sonos Expands Distribution Through the Front and Back Doors Read More

Format Wars II: Revenge of the DVD

Tekrati picked up my post last week on the death of VHS, and implied that I said that Blu-Ray and HD-DVD killed off VHS.  Nothing could be further from the truth!  I often question whether there’s any mass market demand for a high definition format in the first place (and before I get flamed, yes, there is strong enthusiast demand.  I certainly want to go beyond 480p).  But only 11% of households have an HDTV, and anamorphic ("enhanced for widescreen") DVD looks pretty darn good on those sets.  We’re also going into the format war without clear and massive support from the content providers (many of the titles expected to launch this Christmas season for HD-DVD have been pulled).  In my opinion, the real key will be Sony’s PS3, which is supposed to have a Blu-Ray drive.  Will it ship on time?  Will it be affordable?  Will it be a huge hit based on its gameplay, and build an installed base of Blu-Ray players with consumers who would be reluctant to buy a high definition disc player on its own merits?

Regardless, the Blu-Ray/HD-DVD format war is a fiasco of the first order, and doesn’t affect existing formats in any way. Plain old DVD killed VHS. DVD sales are slowing, but that’s just a natural consequence of format saturation; in other words, once people build up their initial library of DVD titles, they stop buying as often.  But we aren’t seeing consumers holding off on DVD purchases because they anticipate the high definition release of the material. 

I was somewhat surprised that Beuna Vista’s backing away from VHS didn’t receive more press.  But this week Video Business reported that LucasFilm is releasing Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith on DVD only.  It seems that the recent Star Wars movie releases performed spectacularly on DVD, but did so poorly on VHS that many retailers sent back their VHS stock to the distributor and had to be destroyed.  Also worth noting: Video Business says Buena Vista will eliminate VHS entirely next year; I expect the rest of the studios to follow.

-avi

Format Wars II: Revenge of the DVD Read More

Engadget’s Walk Down Memory Lane

Engadget unceremoniously posted a version of its witty, sardonic take on all things gadgety (including some home theater content) circa 1985, as if Engadget started out as a BBS (Bulletin Board System – a pre-pre-pre-cursor to web sites).  Was today April 1, and I missed the memo?  This is brilliant, brilliant stuff.  Engadget1985

Of course, there wasn’t much of a home theater industry back in 1985 – which in and of itself is interesting, showing just how fast this market has grown.  The best you could do then was HiFi VHS and a 35" TV — RPTVs were just too dim to work well for most, and front projection was even more unusual.  (No flames, please – yes, I know Runco and several others were around, but this was still before the dawn of Dolby Pro-Logic surround sound).  The big home theater news was getting the new VHS VCR to stop flashing "12:00," now that VHS vs. Beta was effectively over, and the quick rise – and even faster consolidation – of the mom and pop video rental business.

Without any real home theater industry to catch my interest, my focus was on the hot technology of the day – the PC industry.  These were the days of the Coleco Adam (with daisy wheel printing and proprietary tape drives), the Macintosh launch with MacWrite and MacPaint in shades of gray, and Compuserve. When Bill Gates really was as young as he looked. The incredible move from 12" floppies to 8" floppies to 5.25" floppies to 3.5" floppies. Making your fingers forget WordStar keyboard shortcuts to learn WordPerfect keyboard shortcuts. Borland. TRS-80. Atari vs. Intellivision vs. Colecovision.

The comments section on Engadget’s 1985 entry shows a clear generational divide: those who remember the era fondly, and those born too late, who are puzzled by the quaint specs and outrageous prices of the day. In its own way — new companies, rapid obsolescence, completely new technologies — the PC industry in the 80’s was just as exciting and fluid as home theater or even the mobile phone/music/imaging/game/GPS/PDA market is today. The key difference is that those of us who remember the tech of that era were, well, geeks. You had to actively seek out information about the latest chipset or software company, mostly in industry-specific press or at trade shows (tough, but not impossible, to do when you were in high school).

The biggest difference today is not the technology, but the culture, which often takes longer to change. Today, there are Personal Technology columns in every mainstream newspaper. My mother has an LCD TV, Wal~Mart sells several Home Theater In a Box systems, my wife has a cameraphone, and I can’t go to the synagogue without getting pestered with questions about which smartphone to buy or where to position surround sound speakers.  Displays and mobile devices are evolving faster than most folks can keep up with them – the product lifecycle of a cell phone is brutal. But if you’re in the market today for a 42" plasma TV or a converged phone/iPod/camera, you aren’t necessarily a geek – just a regular consumer.

-avi

Engadget’s Walk Down Memory Lane Read More