Bose is Buying McIntosh

Bose announced that it is buying historic amplifier and speaker brand McIntosh Group from its private equity owners for undisclosed terms. McIntosh Group also includes high-end speaker brand Sonus Faber. This acquisition is about three things:
1. McIntosh gives Bose entry into luxury brands/opportunities, especially for its already successful automotive audio business
2. High-end audio is a difficult standalone business; there has been relentless consolidation throughout the industry, and McIntosh's owners were likely looking for an exit. 
3. Bose tech enables McIntosh to get into mobile / personal products. I would expect to see a McIntosh headphones announcement, or possibly IEMs (in-ear monitors) in the next 18 – 24 months as a result.  
Bose is Buying McIntosh Read More

Upgrading to Denon AVR-X8500HA — is an “A” Worth $600?

IMG_7081By Avi Greengart

My home theater serves a test bed for various devices for Techsponential and Home Theater View, and while I was able to test the latest display resolutions on TVs in my soundbar test rigs, my main home theater setup was based on a Denon AVR-X8500H with older HDMI inputs. My main game console is an XBOX Series X and my reference display is an LG C2 OLED 4KTV, so I already had the content and display to fully support 4K/120 gaming, I was just lacking the thing in the middle to connect them while providing extensive surround sound.

Most solid-state electronics are essentially disposable these days, but Denon deserves credit for making the AVR-X8500H somewhat modular: there is a $600 upgrade package that swaps out the HDMI board and turns it into an AVR-X8500HA with (limited) 8K/60 and 4K/120 support (the AVR-X8500HA when sold on its own lists for $4700). I also considered selling my receiver and upgrading to Denon's new flagship, the AVR-A1H. That unit is a monster, with 15 amplifier channels and a $6500 price tag to match. I told Denon PR that I'd be interested in checking out an AVR-A1H when they have review units available, but I can't use the extra amp channels — my theater room is too small to add a third row of in-ceiling Atmos speakers — and I can't justify purchasing one at this time. The AVR-X8500H HDMI 2.1 upgrade board has been listed as $600 and "coming in April 2024" on Denon's site for over a year. It still reads that way today, but in June 2024 the site let me put it in my cart and buy it, so I crossed my fingers and hoped for the best. 

So what do you get when you spend $600 to add an "A" to the AVR-X8500H? Part of the cost goes towards shipping. Denon does not allow end users to perform the upgrade themselves, so an authorized repair center mails you a box to send the 60 lb package to them and then back again to you. The packaging double-boxes the receiver but provides absolutely no guidance whatsoever on next steps. You need to figure out that you're supposed to break apart the styrofoam, place it in specific spots, place the receiver inside — without antennas or remote control — seal it up with packing tape (not included), and call FedEx Ground for a pickup. The service center was just as confused as I was — a rep called to ask what repairs were needed. Denon has a lot of work to do on this experience – from website to packaging to service center processes.

The good news is that the process took less time than I expected — I was only without a receiver for about a week Once I got the unit back, it looked like they replaced the entire front panel — with new stickers attached! — in addition to the new HDMI 2.3 internals around back. There were no changes to the 13 amplifier channels or processing but those are still pretty close to state of the art, so it's not missing much in that regard. At the end of the day, all the HDMI inputs were updated to HDCP2.3, but there is only a single 8K input. That input is also the only 4K/120 input, so if you want to connect both an Xbox Series X and a Playstation 5, you're out of luck. The last console Sony sent over is a Playstation 4 PRO, so that isn't an issue I'm currently facing, but Denon's newer receivers support 8K on all inputs, so that could be a dealbreaker for some.

Once back in my rack, it took me a while to figure out that you need to enable 8K support in the Denon's menu to support 4K/120, that only the 8K input supports 4K/120, and that there are similar settings that need to be enabled on the Xbox and TV. But somewhere between 3AM and 4AM I had Forza 6 working in 4K/120 on my 77" OLED with full surround sound. Despite the improved refresh rate I almost immediately plowed my virtual Subaru into the virtual wall at the virtual Nürburgring racetrack.

Was it worth it? Given how expensive it would be to sell and buy an equivalent receiver (or processor and amps) for my 9.4.2 channel Dolby Atmos system, it was a cost-effective upgrade. However, given the limitations of just a single fully futureproof 8K/4K120 input, it's probably only a matter of time before I need to do a full replacement.

HomeTheaterView is a Techsponential company and does not accept advertising or affiliate payments. Equipment reviews/purchases disclosure:
Denon AVR-X8500H was originally purchased direct from Denon at a discount for reviewers.
The HDMI 2.1 upgrade package was purchased direct from Denon at full retail price. 
The Xbox Series X is a long-term review unit sent by Microsoft. 
The LG 77" C2 OLED was purchased at retail.

Upgrading to Denon AVR-X8500HA — is an “A” Worth $600? Read More

Review: Edifier NeoBuds Pro 2 with Knowles Balanced Armature Drivers

By Avi Greengart

I met with Knowles at CES to discuss their components, and after a few demos I asked that they send over something that uses their balanced armature driver (tweeter) so I could hear it in the real world. A few days after I got back from Las Vegas Edifier sent over these NeoBuds Pro 2. I've been really impressed with the sound quality, especially after I turned off the bass enhance mode (EDM and rap listeners will want to keep it on — it's good, just too much for me). That Knowles tweeter is nicely etched without getting fatiguing, and the 10mm dynamic driver provides controlled bass with enhanced mode off.

ANC is surprisingly good as well. It's not the absolute best I've heard (that would be the Bose QCII), but it's surprisingly close enough that you can use these as your only earbuds — and these only cost $109 on Amazon. One sacrifice is battery life — about 4 hours with ANC — before you'll have to pop them back in the case to recharge. I also found the touch controls a bit finicky, but I'm not a fan of touch controls generally.

I found them comfortable to wear; your ears may vary. Edifier includes five different sizes of silicone tips, so most people should find something that works.

The feature set is full despite the mid-tier price point. High-Res audio, Bluetooth 5.3, wear detection, and spatial audio are all onboard. Wireless charging and multi-device pairing are not, but the sound quality is superb, the ANC is effective, and the price is right.

Review: Edifier NeoBuds Pro 2 with Knowles Balanced Armature Drivers Read More

Cleer Scene is a Pretty Versatile Bluetooth Speaker

IMG_5133by Avi Greengart

Cleer's Scene is a small horizontal Bluetooth speaker that stands out for its looks and versatility. The swoopy, color-on-color industrial design is absolutely gorgeous, especially in the red colorway that Cleer sent over. It may look round, but it is flat on the bottom so it won't roll away. Sonics are good; if sound quality is your primary purchase driver this isn't the last word, but at modest volumes it plays cleanly with an emphasis on midrange. This is a small portable speaker and doesn't play louder (or lower) than physics allows, but it can certainly fill a small room with sound. There are physical control buttons, AUX in, and a microphone so the Scene can double as a speakerphone. It's portable, fully waterproof (IPX7), has up to 12 hours of playback time, and costs a reasonable $99. 

Cleer sent over a Scene for review but HomeTheaterView has no financial relationship with Cleer and does not accept affiliate payments.

Cleer Scene is a Pretty Versatile Bluetooth Speaker Read More

Review: 1More P50

Boxby Avi Greengart

1More is an audio brand that somehow has flown under the radar, despite consistently offering excellent sonics at reasonable prices and getting rave critical reviews. The company's latest earbuds are a bit of a throwback – they aren't wireless, and they don't have any form of active noise cancellation. They even have a 3.5mm headphone jack! Just in case you live in 2023, the P50's do come with a USB-C-to-3.5mm adapter, along with a soft carrying case for the earbuds and accessories so that you don't lose it.
1More should lead a seminar on packaging; for $169 earbuds, the unboxing experience is excellent, setting high expectations for the product itself.

There are FIVE drivers in each of the P50's: one dynamic driver and four planar units. Five drivers sounds like a comedy sketch about adding more razer blades, but the end result is really nice sound for a price a fraction of professional IEMs (In Ear Monitors). 1More claims that these earbuds were tuned by "Grammy award-winning sound engineer Luca Bignardi, capturing the passion and emotion of music." To my non-Grammy award-winning ears, the 1More P50's audio response is extremely flat. The $169 1More P50's sound more like to my reference $1200 UE18's (which have six drivers apiece) than most consumer earbuds that tend to emphasize bass and, to a lesser extent, treble. The treble on the P50's is clear without any ringing or sibilance, but without any extra oomph, so there should be no listener fatigue. They are extremely revealing — you can easily hear the difference between production quality in different musical eras and genres. These really excel in accuracy and soundstage – orchestral, theatrical, and live music is particularly engaging on them. The Hamilton Broadway recording sounds extraordinary on them, and I had to stop writing this review to listen to Marc Knopfler's guitar technique on Dire Straits Live.
In my initial listening tests, bass response was the weakest element. To get the best bass the P50's drivers could deliver, I had to move to the largest foam tips to get a better ear seal. That was a bit uncomfortable, so I compromised with the medium foam tips, and then rotated them to get as tight a seal as possible. YEMV (Your Ears May Vary). This brought the bass back to tracks like Will of the People by Muse or even the chorus on pop tracks like Victoria's Secret by Jax, and completed the flat response across the board. Still, bass does not extend particularly deep and may not be loud enough for bassheads. If you want over-emphasized bass for hip-hop or movie watching, or if you just a warmer midrange, you might be able to get part of the way there with EQ, but these probably aren't the right earbuds for you.

The in-line microphone is fine for calls even in moderately noisy environments, but the volume level is low. If you hold it just a bit closer to your mouth, it sounds great.
One final note: the DAC that's hiding in the adapter is pretty good, but when I substituted in an ifi Go bar, there was a slight reduction in noise and increase in clarity once I matched the volume. Of course, the ifi Go bar costs $329 so pairing that with earbuds that cost half that is kind of ridiculous. But if you do decide to go there, the P50's are capable of revealing any sonic differences.
Highly recommended.
1More sent over a P50 for review but HomeTheaterView has no financial relationship with 1More and does not accept affiliate payments.

Review: 1More P50 Read More

Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 Review

IMG_4296by Avi Greengart

Anker has steadily built its Soundcore brand on two key values: sound quality and low — but not bargain basement — pricing. The multi-driver Liberty Pro 3 are one of my favorite sounding earbuds at any price, but they is apparently priced too close to more traditional brands (read: Apple) and the company has been slow to upgrade them with competitive noise cancellation. Instead, it has focused on its more affordable non-Pro Liberty, first launching the $129 Liberty 4 last year (they were fine) and now the $99 Liberty 4 NC.

Despite the lower price and similar product name, the new Liberty 4 NC headphones are actually a significant upgrade with slightly better sonics and greatly improved adaptive noise cancellation. Rather than applying what seems like a blanket anti-noise filter, the Liberty 4 NC take a few seconds to sample the acoustic environment and then adjust further, similar to the Bose Quiet Comfort II. Where that comparison falls down is that the Soundcore gets quiet, but the Bose magically makes the outside world simply disappear. That's where the Liberty 4 NC presses its price advantage; even on sale the Bose cost over $250, placing it in a completely different price tier.

I enjoyed the Liberty 4 NC's performance on phone calls; callers sounded clear and there is just the right amount of microphone sidetone so you can hear yourself speak and not shout into the mic.

What about sound quality on music? The Liberty 4 NC is nicely balanced: bass is pronounced but not overwhelming or boomy. Treble is clear in the mix but not harsh. That said, these are not the last word in transparency, image separation, or tone. Soundcore's own Liberty Pro 3's have a better overall soundstage, and nothing beats the incredibly low noise floor of Apple's AirPods Pro 2. That said, the Liberty 4 NC does nothing wrong; it's quite a pleasing listening experience, it can be customized further in the app, and it's a tremendous value.

 

Anker gave me Soundcore Liberty 4 for review at a launch event but HomeTheaterView has no financial relationship with Anker and does not accept affiliate payments.

Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 Review Read More

Mini Review for a Mini Speaker: Scosche BoomCan MS

20230419_195400by Avi Greengart

The Scosche BoomCan MS came in really handy yesterday when my flight was cancelled, and I needed to spend another night working on the road. This adorable little Bluetooth speaker attaches magnetically to recent iPhones where it acts as a kickstand and bounces audio off the table for a bit of added reverb. It's using the magnets just to attach, not connect or charge; it will connect to any Bluetooth source, not just iPhones.

It's tiny, so it's hardly the ultimate in fidelity, and it works better with show tunes and pop than Rock or Metal (Muse was more distorted than it's supposed to be). It charges over USB-C and should last several hours (Scosche says five). You can buy a pair and create stereo and I'm sure that's lovely but I strongly suspect most people will just buy one. It's $50, loud enough for hotel-room-writing-music, and so portable that I'm probably making it a permanent resident in my travel bag.

20230420_153431
20230419_194947
20230420_153431 20230420_153431 20230420_153431 20230419_195944

 

 

Scosche sent over a BoomCan MS for review but HomeTheaterView has no financial relationship with Scosche and does not accept affiliate payments.

Mini Review for a Mini Speaker: Scosche BoomCan MS Read More

Review: ifi Audio GO link

IMG_20230126_165058IMG_20230126_165058By Avi Greengart, Lead Analyst, Techsponential

Just because Apple decided that nobody needs a 3.5mm jack on what has become people's primary music device (and all of its competitors followed) doesn't make it true. If you have wired headphones, earbuds, or IEMs (in-ear monitors), you'll need an adapter. The thing is, phones output digitally now and when companies removed the headphone jack, they bypassed the DAC that the silicon typically provides. That means this is a more complicated adapter, as it needs to have its own DAC (digital to analog converter) embedded in there.

Apple started the problem, and it offered a solution: a $9 dongle that converts from Lightning to 3.5mm. That makes it one of Apple's least expensive products of all time, but does it sound any good, and how much do you need to spend to get something noticeably better? (Spoiler: the Apple adapter is actually a bargain for what it is, but if you have good headphones you absolutely can do better.)

A while back, ifi audio sent me their $329 GO bar, which is a great little DAC/headphone amp combo that has a plethora of features, but the one that caught my eye is a special mode to deal with sensitive IEMs. It sounds great, and I will happily recommend it in its category, but if all you're trying to do is connect wired headphones to your phone, it's crazy overkill. So when ifi audio announced a much simpler product, the GO link, for just $59, I had to get one in. The GO link absolutely nails the assignment of adding a good DAC to anything without a 3.5mm headphone jack at a price that makes it an impulse buy. It natively supports USB-C and ifi Audio includes little attachments for Lightning and USB-A (to use as a better DAC than the one in your PC). Unlike the GO bar, it lacks a case, but most people will leave it attached to their headphone cable so that's fine. And it isn't so simple that you can't use made up words to talk about it with your audiophile friends, according to the website, the GO link features a, "Discrete ESS Sabre Hyperstream DAC chipset with time domain jitter eliminator, discrete oscillator and 112dB dynamic range for discerning listeners."

I started my discerning listening with the iPhone 14 Pro and Drop HIFIMAN HE-X4 headphones (budget planar magnetic headphones that deserve their own review someday). The difference between Apple's dongle and the GO link was easy to hear: on the GO link, instruments had more separation and the noise floor was slightly lower. I found it easier to discern certain elements (a unique time signature on the drums, instrument tambre), and the music was more engaging overall. For $9, it's hard to complain about Apple's dongle. It's not bad! But if you are an active listener and have invested in high quality headphones, there is easily a significant enough difference to justify the expense of the GO link.

Next, I tested the ifi Audio GO link on a [embargoed upcoming Android phone] and compared it to Anker's $20 USB-C to 3.5mm dongle. On the relatively inefficient HIFIMAN headphones, the difference was stark: the GO link can play so much louder than the Anker that it isn't fair — the Ankers are a poor fit for this application. Apple and Anker do not specify output power on their adapters, but ifi Audio marketing does: "power output of 70mW into 32 ohms, and a maximum voltage output of 2.05V into 600 ohms."

ifi Audio also claims that its S-Balanced circuit delivers better performance on IEMs, too, so I tested them with Ultimate Ear UE12 IEMs. These require minimum power to drive, so the Anker was much more competitive. The GO links still played louder, but on IEMs that's irrelevant unless you want to damage your hearing. At more reasonable volume levels, the GO link did sound a bit better than the Ankers — I noticed that bass drum kicks were a bit fuller — but it's subtle. Whatever DAC Anker is using does sound good and they are a third the price.

Overall, given the simplicity and versatility with both input (USB-C, USB-A, Lightning) and output (even on more demanding headphones) the ifi audio GO link is a no-brainer. Highly recommended.

Review: ifi Audio GO link Read More

TCL’s MTRO 200NC First Impressions

IMG_1367TCL is best known for its high-value televisions, but it is actually one of the largest consumer electronics conglomerates in the world. TCL runs its own factories and is investing $8 billion in its latest display panel fab. TCL's mobile division sells Alcatel and TCL branded featurephones, smartphones, and tablets, and the parent company also makes washing machines, refrigerators, consumer IoT devices, and more.

I have tested some of TCL's super-inexpensive in-ear headphones — some as low as $10 — and found them to be ridiculous values; they sound as good as products 10x the cost. So I was eager to get in TCL's on-ear MTRO headphones, now in a version with active noise cancellation, for just $79. Can they compete against products that are 4x – 6x more expensive from Sony, Bose, Apple (Beats), and others? In a word, no.

  • The good: they sound good: the noise floor is low, the bass is well rounded without being bloated, and mid-range is just a bit lively, which sounds great on rock and pop. I also liked that there are physical buttons on the earcup; I'm not convinced that consumers can remember or properly execute swiping maneuvers on the go. 
  • The bad: the MTRO 200NC's noise cancellation is really weak. A female Voice of God loudly informs you every time you turn noise canceling on or off, so there's no question whether it is engaged, but it just doesn’t do very much. Also, charging is via ancient microUSB, rather than USB-C, so you'll need to keep a dedicated charging cable on hand.
  • And the ugly news: these look and feel like those $29 BEATZ or SUMSANG headphones you see at drugstores, not like a product from a company with a respected global brand, major sports sponsorships, and $11 billion in revenue last year. The flimsy cardboard and plastic packaging could not be cheaper, and it is not helped by the font choice and colors. The headphones themselves are no better: the plastic used on the headband and earcups feel rough and the buttons are toy-like. Even at $79, even if you are willing to look past the noise cancelation performance, aesthetics matter. If you can overlook the out of box experience (OOBE) and build quality, fine, but if you are giving them as a holiday gift, you should be aware that they don't look like they cost as much as they do.

IMG_1366IMG_1366 IMG_1366IMG_1366IMG_1366

TCL’s MTRO 200NC First Impressions Read More

Dolby, WB, AMC 20th Anniversary Re-release of The Matrix at Dolby Cinemas

Matrix-1080x1600-c5To celebrate the 20th anniversary of The Matrix, Dolby, AMC, and Warner Brothers are bringing the movie back to the big screen. It appears that they are taking the work that was done for the upgraded 4K Dolby Vision/Atmos disc and exhibiting it in Dolby Cinemas for a limited run. Last week, I attended a press screening of The Matrix at Dolby Cinema with two of my teenagers; one had not seen the film before, and he was positively jumping out of his seat at the end. I have the 4K disc, and I have a fairly advanced home theater with Dolby Vision and Atmos, but there is something to be said for watching this movie on a really large, really bright screen, in a dark venue with strangers, and dozens of speakers surrounding you and overhead.

The audio sees the biggest improvement from pre-Atmos mixes; the bass gets extra punch, the foley effects are even more directional, and, at key moments, the score completely fills the room in a way that the original mix did not. However, while The Matrix is strong Dolby Atmos reference material, it is not the best film to show off Dolby Vision. The additional contrast is both visible and welcome, but this is not a film where an extended color palette is used (for that, try Thor: Ragnarok). However, the engineers who remastered The Matrix for Dolby Vision deserve credit for doing no harm: key dark, grainy scenes (such as the opening, where cops holding flashlights approach Trinity) retain the film grain they started with.

With a new installment in The Matrix now planned to start production next year, it’s worth going out to the theater to see the original again. In my professional opinion, “whoa.”

Dolby, WB, AMC 20th Anniversary Re-release of The Matrix at Dolby Cinemas Read More