What it takes to launch a new media format

JupiterKagan’s Michael Gartenberg has a great post about the three elements needed to successfully launch a new consumer media format. He concludes that neither HD-DVD or Blu-Ray measures up.

-avi

Full disclosure: I created the diagram that Michael uses to illustrate his point back when I was an analyst at what was then called JupiterResearch and he was my Research Director; it was for a report on next generation audio formats.

What it takes to launch a new media format Read More

Sony Kills Blu-Ray Advantage with PS3 Pricing

When assessing the relative strength of HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray for high definition disc format war handicapping, I have always been quick to point out that DVD is the likely successor to DVD, as it is "good enough" for most consumers and addresses a larger installed base of non-HDTVs in addition to HDTV sets with decent anamorphic ("enhanced for widescreen TV") performance. But the other thing I have noted time and time again is that Sony’s Playstation 3 (PS3) was a potential trojan horse, bringing Blu-Ray playback to the masses. At E3 today, Sony announced the pricing and availability for the PS3, and it’s… well, it’s late and it’s exhorbitant. In the U.S., the PS3 will start shipping November 17 for at least $500. $600 buys the version with HDMI, which you’ll need to get all that Blu-Ray goodness over to your HDTV. Will Sony sell more $500 and $600 PS3’s than Toshiba sells of its $500 HD-DVD deck? Probably, but this is hardly a price point that will resonate beyond hard core gamers, and the Blu-Ray capabilities are not a "freebie" when you have to pay $600 for it.

The PS3 pricing will come down over time, and so will pricing on standalone HD-DVD and Blu-Ray decks. And the PS3 may yet be the tipping point that puts Blu-Ray over the edge. But even if that does end up being the case, this trojan horse is going to take an awfully long time to mosey over the finish line. In the meantime, it’s looking like both formats will have a long, tough fight ahead of them, and may never amount to much more than the laserdisc of this era, to be replaced by on-demand downloads, holographic media, better codecs for red-laser media(DVD-something) or …something else.

-avi

Sony Kills Blu-Ray Advantage with PS3 Pricing Read More

Sonos System Review

What_boxhero1 I’ll admit it up front – one of the key reasons I run Home Theater View is to get early looks at products like the Sonos system. I have been following Sonos since well before it launched. The concept is simple: Sonos takes the music you’re already storing and managing on your PC and streams it to multiple locations around your house. The controller looks like an iPod, and, like an iPod, nearly anyone can use it. Each Sonos unit becomes part of a separate wireless mesh network – no WiFi needed, and setup consists of pushing a couple of buttons and letting Sonos do all the work. Sonos can play different music in each room, synchronize music to multiple rooms, or synchronize music to all rooms ("party" mode). Sonos can also accept music from any room and stream that back to any or all of the other units.

Sonos launched with a 2 room $1199 bundle: Sonos supplied a player/amplifier (ZP100) for each room and a controller (CR100), but expected consumers to BYOS (Bring Your Own Speakers). Zp80_heroSonos quickly heard that the BYOS strategy was DOA for a large segement of their target market, and rolled out Sonos-branded speakers for $179, or as part of a $1499 package for two amps, two pair of speakers, and a controller. The most recent update to the system is the ZP80 (pictured at right), which asks consumers to BYOA (Bring Your Own Amplifiers), which makes sense for economically integrating home theater systems and the like, which already have their own amps.

Zp100_hero_1 My test setup included a ZP80 along with a pair of ZP100’s (pictured at left), a C100, and a pair Sonos Speakers. I have also hooked up a pair of Carver HT5.1 bookshelf speakers to one ZP100 and an Altec Lansing self-powered satellite-subwoofer PC speaker system to the ZP80.

Pricing: It Depends On Your Point Of View

What’s unique about the Sonos’ pricing is that it is either extremely expensive or a significant bargain, depending on your point of view. The Sonos ZonePlayers are $499 each for the ZP100 (the one with a built-in amplifier) and $349 for a ZP80 (the one without the amplifier). ZoneControllers cost $399 each, speakers are $179, charging docks for the ZoneController are $49, and a spare charger cables is another $19. The least expensive bundle is $999, which will be fine for many users, but expects users to both BYOS and BYOA.

This pricing makes technical early adopters scratch their heads and whine that compared to most streaming audio players, the Sonos is wildly overpriced. The Omnifi Simplefi I’ve had in the house for a couple of years, along with products from Pinnacle, Roku, Squeezebox, Linksys, and Apple, all cost between $129 and $299. Other options are mating an iPod with an Apple, Klipsch, or Bose audio dock: presto! music wherever you are. Finally, a cheapskate friend pointed out that boomboxes cost $39 at Target and can also put music in your room. If you’d be happy with a boombox – or even an iPod and an Apple HiFi – then the Sonos is clearly too expensive.

At the other extreme, a custom installed system can cost tens of thousands of dollars for a multi-zone setup that would cost $3,000 or $4,000 with a Sonos. In this respect, the Sonos is an incredible bargain.

The problem with the iPod and boombox is that they are single zone solutions – when you leave that room, you leave your music (and the boombox will only be able to play a fraction of your music collection, digitized or not). True, you could put a speaker dock in every room of your house and move the iPod with you, and if you live alone, this is a perfectly valid solution, but even then you need to move the iPod every time you leave the room, and it’s hardly sufficient for a party.

The problem with most streaming media players is that they are either single zone (Apple, Linksys), cannot selectively synchronize music among multiple zones (all but the Squeezebox), have no display for selecting music to play (Apple, Linksys), have only a basic user interface (all), require a reasonable level of comfort with technology for setup (all except the Apple), and cannot accept music from remote sources and stream that around (all).

Where the Sonos Shines

In practice, the biggest drawback to most streaming music solutions is that they either need to be hooked up to a display, which limits where you can put them in the house, or they have a one line display and a rudimentary remote control, which makes moving through large music collections annoying. My wife was delighted when she discovered that with the Sonos What_hero2she could quickly and easily create disposable mini-playlists by selecting songs and albums and putting them into the queue for just the two rooms she was working in that day. The large screen, scroll wheel, straightforward user interface, and multi-zone capabilities on the Sonos makes that scenario possible, and she discovered it without cracking the owner’s manual. (Our five year old also likes choosing his music and routing it to zones throughout the house, but, then, he’s five. Today’s five year olds can master anything.)

Another neat trick the Sonos does is digitize and stream any source you feed one ZonePlayer to any or all of the other zones in your home. In practice, this means you can plug in a friends iPod, programmed with his party mix, and blast the music all over the house. The ZonePlayer accepts analog signals, so a favorite record or tape can be streamed around as well (though a preamplifier may be needed for phonographs to present a loud enough signal to the system). I even plugged in Nokia’s latest music phone and a Kurzweil digital piano and used those as sources. The volume needed to be adjusted based on the source, but, other than that it works like magic.

Custom installed multi-zone audio systems can do all these things, too. There are several systems on the market that offer rich user interfaces, tech-free setup because someone else sets it up, and even remote source streaming. The problem here is one of price: to do what a Sonos does, you might have to pay tens of thousands of dollars for a sophisticated touch-screen based multi-zone system. A single Crestron controller costs more than a basic Sonos system.

Performance

The Sonos’ sound quality was excellent across the board. The Sonos system could resolve enough detail that the weak link in the chain was typically the codec used to compress the music, not the Sonos wireless system, amps, or speakers. Having said that, it won’t convince hardcore audiophiles to give up turntables, tube amps, and a pair of Vandersteen speakers and settle in for a dedicated listening session. But for the types of uses a Sonos system enables, the Sonos provides all the audio performance that’s needed.

Sp100_lg_1_2The speakers (pictured at right – click to enlarge) are actually quite a bargain. Bass is tight, highs are well resolved, and the midrange is pleasant. In a direct comparison, the Carvers were easily audibly superior with better bass and better presence in the treble, but the Carvers are a bipole design and were part of a system back in the day that retailed for a lot more than $179. I can easily recommend the Sonos speakers at their price point.

Installation and Setup

One key drawback is that a hard wired (Ethernet) connection is required from your PC to the first ZonePlayer unit. After that, Sonos has its own built in mesh network (technically not WiFi) that sets itself up automatically. Like all mesh networks, the more nodes (ZonePlayers and ZoneControllers) on the network, the stronger the network will be. The "first node: wired" restriction is not a problem for users who have Ethernet networks in their homes, but how many people does that cover? Worse, unless you’re willing to string that first wire out of the computer room, the first ZonePlayer is redundant, as most PCs have speakers attached to them already, and the Sonos Desktop Controller PC software will happily drive them.

Aside from that limitation, the setup process itself is simple even for non-technical users. You do need a PC, but you don’t need a home network. To get each unit to discover the network, you simply press the "mute" and "volume up" buttons found on the front of each unit. There are several companies working to make this type of plug and play wireless networking a reality for WiFi, but for now, Sonos’ proprietary solution justifies itself well here. After the initial software installation on your PC, the system will literally updates itself and all the ZonePlayers and ZoneControllers with no user intervention required.

Each ZoneController can control all the zones in the system, but users should keep in mind that as they add zones, they’ll need to add expensive ZoneControllers as well. There’s nothing more frustrating than a powerful multi-zone system that’s playing the wrong music in the zone you’re in and the ZoneController is several rooms away. This may offend Puritans everywhere, but let’s face it, once the remote control was invented, did you ever get up to change the channel again? Now think about going to the other side of your house to change the channel. This is why you need more than one ZoneController.

Over several months I did experience a handful of times where the ZoneController inexplicably locked up. Judging from the message boards, this does not seem to be a widespread problem, but it did give me the opportunity to test out Sonos’ tech support. Using the web "call me" feature, the response was instantaneous and the support rep was knowledgeable. The culprit was diagnosed as wireless interference, but resetting the ZoneController also seemed to trigger a software upgrade (which happened automatically in the background) and there have been no problems since then.

Conclusion

Sonos is narrowly targeted: it doesn’t do video. At all. In this respect, more capable systems may be a better investment. Interestingly, the best video storage system I have seen, the Kaleidescape, doesn’t do audio. So there’s clearly something to be gained in simplicity by restricting functionality to one type of media and doing it right. Still, consumers looking for a complete audio, video, and home automation solution will have to look elsewhere.

Even within audio, Sonos is constrained by DRM. REAL Rhapsody subscribers will be thrilled to discover they can access their entire music subscription library through the Sonos. But tracks purchased from iTunes or other Windows Plays For (Almost) Sure DRM stores won’t play at all.

The Sonos may not translate well outside the U.S. It is easiest to justify for larger homes, like the McMansions that dot our suburbs where its multi-zone capabilities will be put to good use. It does not make as much sense for urban apartments or any type of home in space-constrained Japan. The system’s flexibility only goes so far: Sonos needs water resistant units for the kitchen and bathroom, and an in-wall version for custom installation would be welcome as well. The system as a whole is a bargain but the accessories are badly overpriced, and at least one dock ought to be included with every controller from the outset. Finally, Sonos needs an all-wireless version, where the first unit is WiFi, and Sonos’ mesh network takes over from there.

Sonos has done a good job of creating a system that should sell itself to upscale mainstream users, but as long as distributed PC-based audio is in the early adopter phase of market development, Sonos needs to do a better job in its marketing materials explaining how it differs from the Squeezeboxes and Rokus of the world.

As I finish writing this review, my wife is listening to – and singing along loudly with – The Bangles’ "Eternal Flame" in the kitchen and family room, while I have The Strokes on in the office. She says we don’t have to buy the review sample, but I’m not so sure…

-avi

Sonos System Review Read More

Just How Good Are Multimedia Speakers?

I had to temporarily disassemble my primary multimedia PC system last week (it sits in front of a window that was being replaced) and decided it was finally time to provide some thoughts on multimedia surround sound systems. This is long overdue. How long overdue? One of the systems I intended to review, Klipsch’s ProMedia 5.1, was discontinued a few years ago and replaced with the ProMedia Ultra 5.1. The other, a Logitech Z-5500 system the company was kind enough to send over last year, is no longer a new model either. Logitech added the Z-5450 to the line, which offers wireless surround speakers, though, unlike ProMedia, at least the Z-5500 is at least still on the market!

Logitech_z5500_1Both THX systems are impressive, and can pressurize my small room to over 110 decibels without distortion – true THX reference level, and way too loud for normal listening without causing permanent hearing damage. As a PC peripheral, they’re definitely pricey add-ons. Hard core gamers buying $4,000 PCs should be able to set aside a tenth of that for audio, but with a $400 budget PC it may be harder to justify spending nearly the same amount on the speakers as on the whole computer. Still, when considered as home theater speakers, the systems are quite reasonably priced – you simply won’t find HTIB speakers under $400 that compete with them.

However, there is a huge caveat: multimedia systems are designed for use with a PC. With XP Media Center systems and large LCD monitor/TVs proliferating, perhaps that’s not as unusual a proposition as it was a few years ago, but there are other considerations as well. Multimedia systems are designed for near-field listening: like studio monitors, speaker designers know where you’ll be sitting — right up in front of the speakers, not ten feet away on your couch. Therefore, while the power and THX certification of these systems ensures often spectacular audio performance in a small room with one or two listeners, they simply aren’t designed to be cheap replacements for a living room system. But for secondary systems, dorm rooms, gaming, and small rooms, the performance and value a 5.1 multimedia system can provide is impressive.

Promedia51_300_1 My initial experience with Logitech’s first generation 5.1 speaker systems was not a positive one: the subwoofer was boomy, and the main speakers added a modest amount of unwelcome colorization to the sound. Klipsch has a long history (decades of experience, actually) with the MicroTractix horn drivers used for upper frequencies in the ProMedia system, and the resulting sound was clearly superior to Logotype’s first effort. However, with the Z-5500, Logitech upgraded the main drivers to "polished aluminum phase-plug" units that "combine two drivers into one–the clarity of a tweeter with the richness and fullness of a separate mid-range." Despite my usual skepticism about product marketing drivel (in a past life, I was a product marketing manager myself), in this case, the marketing copy basically has it right. The new driver array is a marked improvement. The subwoofer didn’t improve nearly as much; it can play louder than before, but is still too boomy for my taste, overemphasizing sounds in the upper bass region (I’d guess in the 70 – 90 Hz range). In comparison, the Klipsch’s sub is well controlled down to about 35 – 40 Hz, after which it basically disappears, which is a fair trade-off for a small system. I suspect that consumers – particularly gamers – may actually prefer the Z-5500’s boomier sound, but I’m a home theater snob and wish for better accuracy. The Klipsch sub also provides more flexibile placement options than the Logitech, which comes with a prominent warning not to place the rather large unit directly next to a PC – the exact spot I suspect most users intend to use.

One area where the Logitech solidly trounces the Klipsch and edges closer to HTIB territory is the control unit. The Digital SoundTouch Control Center is quite a bit more than just a volume control. As you’d expect, it can accept multi-channel audio from a PC, but it can also do multichannel decoding itself, supports DTS 96/24, and connects to as many as 6 sources simultaneously. For some users, the flexibility and versatility will be a deciding factor; you could hook up a DVD player directly to the Z-5500 and avoid firing up the PC altogether.

Either of these systems provides a fabulous home theater experience for a PC-based system in a den, home office, or dorm room. To my ears, the Klipsch provides better sound thanks to a tighter subwoofer, but gamers who want things to go "boom" along with consumers looking for additional input and decoding flexibility may want to consider the Logitech first.

-avi

Correction: the Logitech Z-5450 has wireless rear surround speakers, not the "Z5540," as originally posted. 

Just How Good Are Multimedia Speakers? Read More

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 5: Convergence

Part V, the final installment of my post-CES chronicles; each of these posts includes a quick look back on 2005 trends and a quick discussion of products introduced at CES 2006. This installment: Convergence

In 2005…

Windows XP Media Center Edition PC sales finally took off – but as replacements for home PCs (wherever in the home they may reside, not necessarily the living room), and using traditional vertical box form factors, not the electronics-rack-style Home Theater PC. With Microsoft dropping the requirement for TV tuners, many of the XPMCE PCs were just that – regular PCs with a nifty 10 foot user interface for media control. Meanwhile, PVR functionality was integrated into the cable and satellite box in a big way, and moved time shifting into many more homes. The tech media declared place shifting the next big thing. Place shifting, the notion of watching your content anywhere you are using a web browser, was first introduced by Orb Networks (limited to PC-based content), followed by Sony’s LocationFree TV (control primarily of live TV) and then by Sling Media’s SlingBox (which allows viewing and control of nearly all content, including shows saved to a TiVo or ReplayTV).

At CES…

Sling Media introduced a Windows Mobile client for the SlingBox, solving one of the big problems of place shifting: very few people spend so much time on the road that they would be willing to buy a gadget to gain access to their home content. But moving the content to any Windows Mobile smartphone is more generally useful; everyone has some down time in their schedule that could be filled with even more TV! SlingBox for Windows Mobile also bypasses a lot of the services that wireless carriers are hoping to sell to consumers directly, and in this sense, it is an extremely disruptive technology.

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 5: Convergence Read More

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 3: Audio

Part III of my post-CES rantings; each of the next few posts includes a quick look back on 2005 trends and a quick discussion of products introduced at CES 2006. This installment: Audio

In 2005…

Apple’s iPod ate up whatever audio interest there was left after the purchase of that HDTV. The audiophile approach (ignore it and it will go away) didn’t work, the competitive approach (building servers or portable products that compete with the iPod head on) dramatically didn’t work – though there were a handful of exceptions, and the conciliatory approach (if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em) of building iPod docks and add-ons got very, very crowded. One of the more notable exceptions to the “don’t compete with the iPod” rule was Sonos, which piggybacks on existing PC-based music libraries and distributes audio wirelessly around the house. The key to success here is both the flawless user interface and the premium consumer price point. Typical CE pricing would not support the margins Sonos needs to survive, but the Sonos system is still within reach of many consumers, as opposed to custom installed distributed audio systems which can often cost an order of magnitude more.

At CES 2006…

We saw more of everything. Competing with the iPod were several nano clones, Toshiba’s new (and impressive) GigaBeat Portable Media Center, and several Windows Media Center or set top box whole-house server products for storing your music collection (some piggybacking on Intel’s new VIIV campaign). The server efforts were at least partly conciliatory, as most included Apple iPod docking capabilities.

2005 In Review / CES 2006 Review, Pt. 3: Audio Read More

Media Center PC, Part 2: Logitech Harmony 680

This is the second in a series on experiences using and enhancing Windows XP Media Center for home theater.

To control my Media Center, I have two remote controls: one for the audio system, and one for the Media Center itself. (As mentioned last time, I also use the media control buttons from the Logitech DiNovo media pad as a remote of sorts).  While this is an extremely basic setup – no plasma TV, no audio receiver, no light control – it still seemed like two remote controls for one desk was overkill, and I had a Logitech Harmony 680 oHarmony_680_for_webn hand to consolidate things.  The 680 is billed as a Media Center PC remote control, and it has a few buttons dedicated to peculiarly Media Center tasks – a big green button to launch the interface, and an "info" button, for example.  Like all Harmony remote controls, the idea is that the remote programs itself based on an online questionnaire you fill out.  This limits the market for their remotes somewhat to people who have Internet connections, but that’s certainly not an issue for an XP Media Center remote!

In a brilliant move, the Harmony 680 works as a stock XP Media Center remote control straight out of the box – no connection to a PC required, no configuration.  You do need to put in the batteries, but, in another nice touch, those are also included in the box.

Connecting to the Internet and programming the remote did not go quite as well.  After installing the PC software, and registering and creating an account online, I had trouble getting the site to work properly at all until I noticed that my pop-up blocker seemed to be interfering with key messages the site was sending.  Pop-ups enabled, the software tried to upgrade the firmware on the remote, but ran into problems.  After bouncing around through the "troubleshooting" option, the culprit was discovered: the version of the PC-based software (which connects the remote to the web site) needed to be upgraded, too.  None of this is all that unusual when setting up PC products or interacting with rich web sites, but it is a hazard of combining the two.

That accomplished, the next step was testing the setup. There were two main problems.  First, the remote simply didn’t work for listening to the radio using the Media Center.  My_radio_for_webIt seems that the "Listen To Radio" activity defaults to only three or four buttons programmed, which makes changing stations impossible.  This was easy to fix once I found the right menu option in the web setup; all the commands are pre-programmed, they just aren’t assigned to the buttons for this particular activity.  Odd.

The other problem is the way Harmony tracks the "state" (on, off) of your components.  With traditional macros (a memorized string of commands), the whole sequence gets thrown out of whack if your DVD player happened to be on when you initiate the "watch a DVD" macro.  The Harmony tries to manage the state of things so that it knows what to turn on, and what not to.  If there’s something out of whack, Harmony’s narrated help button ("Is your DVD player on?") puts things back in order.  This is one of Harmony’s best qualities for controlling a big, dedicated home theater setup, but on a Media Center PC, it was infuriating.  With a Media Center PC, you tend to bounce around a lot between activities, jumping from music listening to recorded TV watching and back. There’s really never any need to turn off the "amplifier" (powered speakers, in this case).  In fact, for a PC-based system that’s also used as a regular PC, shutting things down is counterproductive – when you’re finished with a music or movie session, you still want the speakers on for email alerts and other Windows sounds. 

Shutting down the 680’s urge to shut down was similarly easy to do online, once I figured out where in the menu setup this particular option lay.  In fact, that’s my primary problem with the Harmony system: initial setup is easy.  Tweaking is actually easy, too.  It’s just hard to navigate – the whole system is like a classic PC branching text adventure game from the early 1980s (yes, I know, I’m dating myself).  If you follow the path, you might get where you want.  Or not.  There’s no way to see the list of choices and what options reside in which paths.  Logitech needs to spend a little more time working out the user interface kinks of the online site.

With the remote finally set up just the way I wanted, it did indeed replace two separate remote controls, and, thus far, I’m finding it about as easy to use as HP’s Media Center remote for basic control.  Some of the HP’s remote’s buttons are easier to find by feel – the Harmony’s buttons are arranged nicely, but all have the same glossy pearl feel to them, so until your fingers learn which button is where, you need to look down at the remote before pressing things. 

Conclusion

The 680 is clearly overkill for my system.  But for a larger system where the Media Center PC is the central hub,or just a small part of the home theater, it may be mandatory.  There are few real competitors: most universal remotes don’t have the right button and command structure to control a Media Center PC, and touch screen remotes are both more expensive and far more difficult to program.  Logitech’s online setup system does need a little work to make tweaking systems a bit easier, but the basic approach is sound.

In fact, the Harmony approach allows users to control an XP Media Center without explicit programming – just select the Media Center as a device in the questionnairre, and it will work with the 680, or the 688 (which also has dedicated skip forward buttons for use with a TiVo or ReplayTV) or even the new 880 (with a larger and more flexible programmable color screen).  The 880 may be preferred when using a large, widescreen monitor with a Media Center PC, as the soft buttons and screen are used to provide aspect ratio control – another button most universal remote controls lack.  (We have a Harmony 880 in from Logitech; a full review is planned.)

-avi

Media Center PC, Part 2: Logitech Harmony 680 Read More

The XP Media Center PC Experience

This is the first in a series on experiences using and enhancing Windows XP Media Center for home theater.

When I needed to upgrade my home office PC earlier this year, I chose to buy a Media Center PC because of the endless testing possibilities it offers.  At the time, the Orb service, which lets you stream content from your PC to any Internet connected device, only worked on Media Center PCs (it still requires a PC with a TV tuner card to be compelling).  Media Center extenders require a Media Center PC as a hub (though I currently use an omnifi streaming media player, which will work on any Windows XP PC).  And previous experience showed that Microsoft’s 10 foot user interface was the most functional and elegant solution on the market.

1095c_for_web The Media Center PC I purchased, HP’s 1095c, comes in a full sized vertical case, not a living room friendly horizontal case.  It would not fit in well with a living room based on noise, either – a fan is constantly running.  The box came preloaded with XP Windows Media Center 2003; a coupon was provided for an upgrade to the much-improved 2005 version.  The upgrade process was relatively smooth and uneventful, but required a tremendous number of stops and starts and restarts (installation babysitting). 

Since then, I have had only one area of difficulty – burning recorded TV content to DVD.  For whatever reason, Media Center appears to think that the DVD recording drivers are not installed, and gives me error messages.  Loading third party tools – such as Roxio’s excellent Easy Media Creator 7.5 did not help (despite coming with its own DVD burning engine).  I also had trouble simply opening up the recorded TV folder within Easy Media Creator 7.5; the program routinely crashed.  Roxio assures me that they’re working on identifying and fixing Media Center glitches in future versions of the software. 

As a PC, the XP Media Center is an able performer – fast, and versatile.  I have not tried any hard core gaming or graphics tests, but I have done video editing on it using Adobe’s Premier Elements software.  As a home theater component, it is somewhat lacking, largely due to the limited screen size (currently a 19" Samsung LCD).  Audio is not a problem: I have hooked up both Klipsch’s 5.1 THX ProMedia speakers and Logitech’s latest Z-5500 THX 5.1 speaker systems (separate review coming soon). 

I was actually most surprised by its capabilities as a "media center."  This was unexpected, as I have reviewed XP Media Centers several times before, as dedicated home theater components in our basement (several early HP iterations of XP Media Center), and as "stereo cabinet replacements" in our living room (Gateway’s sadly deceased but not forgotten 610 system).  I’m certainly familiar with the basic functionality.  But I found myself using the system far more than I anticipated – in full 10 foot Media Center user interface mode – while working five feet away on my corporate notebook.  I find myself taking work breaks by watching pieces of The Simpsons, skipping through commercials and large chunks of the programming at will.  The Media Center is jukebox central, with playlists culled from (legal) downloads and several hundred CD’s burned to the hard drive.  I also queue up FM radio stations and skip through commercials (if the station has been "paused") or simply bounce around among multiple choices.

Dinovo_for_web Finally, to control all this from the other desk, I have one of two choices always at hand. One is obvious: the Media Center’s infrared remote.  But I also use Logitech’s Bluetooth DiNovo keyboard, which splits out the numeric keybad on a separate unit.  The satellite keypad contains several useful items, including a full calculator, notification of new email messages, and media control.  I keep the QWERTY section of the keyboard in front of the Media Center (with the mouse next to it in my undersized keyboard tray), and the satellite section on the other desk next to my notebook as a remote control/information center/calculator.  The DiNovo is expensive, and was intended to be a statement of style.  However, the form factor and flexibility makes the price tag justifiable without aesthetic considerations.

Coming up:

  • Adding ATI’s HDTV Wonder to the Media Center PC
  • Another Logitech method of remote control: the Harmony 680
  • Dual purpose monitors
  • 5.1 THX speaker system showdown

-avi

The XP Media Center PC Experience Read More

When the walls are open, Microsoft’s moving in

I was at Microsoft’s Preview Day today in New York, which for me was largely about mobile devices (see my bio). One thing that came across clearly, however, was the centrality of Windows XP Media Center (XP MCE) to Microsoft’s overall consumer plans.  This reminded me of an interesting case study in Digital Connect about a custom installer, Silicon East, which has a somewhat unique specialty putting systems into new construction. That’s nothing new – when the walls are open, it’s the best time to put in home networking gear, and the walls are never more open than during new construction. But rather than get Mr. New Homeowner to buy a typical custom installation A/V system, Silicon East is pushing PC’s with XP MCE. 

This should be a pretty tough sell, as the notion of using a PC as a media hub still hasn’t hit mass adoption yet – at best, builders are content to wire up a house for broadband and create a media nook where a plasma TV can be hung on the wall.  Silicon East gets around this by selling the builder first.  They actually go out to builders and hook their offices up with MCE boxes.  The latest version of XP MCE is nearly as slick as a TiVo (and far more versatile – I’m typing this column on one); once the builders are hooked, they demonstrate it to potential customers in the model homes.

Silicon East gives up some margin figures (7% on hardware, 30% on service), and notes that they turn down business that’s likely to be unprofitable (any time the customer uses the term, "Dell"). The initial foray is almost a loss leader – once the customer is hooked, there are follow on opportunities for display sales, system extensions, and all kinds of home automation.

-avi

When the walls are open, Microsoft’s moving in Read More

Yes, it was a live demo… also a misleading one

Back in February I wrote about Microsoft’s Lightspeed IPTV demo at CES and linked to BusinessWeek’s skeptical coverage.  Well, the magazine was just biding its time and this week they completely skewer the initiative (subscription required), highlighting the endless delays in commercializing it.  It seems the impressive demo I saw at CES was real.  The problem is that the technology doesn’t work for millions of users at once, which is kind of important for the operators who want to broadly deploy it.  Live and learn.

Still, TV over IP seems somewhat inevitable. Japan and Korea have DSL service 10x faster than what U.S. operators provide and at lower prices. I’d think that deploying dramatically faster DSL would both solve many of the technical problems with IPTV and at the same time provide the service justification for consumers to upgrade to broadband (or even switch from cable modems).

-avi

Yes, it was a live demo… also a misleading one Read More